QQQ vs VTV: holdings overlap

Compare QQQ and VTV by shared holdings, minimum-weight overlap, source dates, and an illustrative 50/50 blend.

Editorial review required before launchBuild edition: September 2026Sources and limits below

QQQ and VTV share 4.87% weighted overlap among the top reported holdings in each fund's most recent SEC Form N-PORT-P filing (QQQ period Jun 30, 2026; VTV period Jun 30, 2026). Coverage is partial: QQQ reports 52.91% and VTV reports 26.28% of each fund's largest positions, not its full portfolio.

N-PORT-P is a monthly holdings report filed with the SEC on a reporting lag: funds have up to 60 days after quarter-end to file, and this build only ingests filings already public on EDGAR. The dates above are each fund’s own report period, not today’s date.

Open QQQ vs VTV in the tool

The blended portfolio below assumes a 50/50 allocation. Overlap itself does not require this allocation.

Fund A

QQQ

Jun 30, 2026

106 days old52.91%

reported coverage

50% of your blend
Weighted overlap4.87%

Lower bound from partial holdings

4.87%1 shared securities23 distinct reported identifiers
Fund B

VTV

Jun 30, 2026

106 days old26.28%

reported coverage

50% of your blend

Combined top 10 26.46%

Unreported exposure 60.4%

Changing the blend changes your exposure, not fund-to-fund overlap.

One or both holdings files are incomplete. Overlap can be higher than shown. Holdings are not silently normalized to 100%.

Your blended exposures

50% QQQ / 50% VTV

Sector mix

Unreported weight remains visible.

Overlap vs. distinct exposure

Lower bound from partial holdings, not a complete overlap.

Overlap versus distinct and unreported holdings weightWeighted overlap: 4.87%QQQ only: 48.04%VTV only: 21.41%Unreported: 60.4%
Weighted overlap: 4.87%QQQ only: 48.04%VTV only: 21.41%Unreported: 60.4%
Overlap versus distinct and unreported holdings weight
SegmentValue
Weighted overlap4.87%
QQQ only48.04%
VTV only21.41%
Unreported60.4%

Pairwise overlap matrix

Minimum-weight overlap across all funds in the loaded snapshot.

Pairwise fund overlap
FundVTVQQQ
VTVSame fund4.87%
QQQ4.87%Same fund

Compare more funds at once

Select 2 to 5 funds for an equal-weighted blended holdings table. This assumes an equal allocation to each fund, not your real portfolio mix.

Check 2 to 5 funds to build the blended table below.

Compare your own portfolio

Import a CSV of ticker,amount to see how your holdings overlap with Fund A’s reported holdings and where your own sector mix sits.

Header row required: symbol,amount. Amounts are dollar values, not share counts.

Look through every reported holding

Coverage: QQQ 52.91% (Jun 30, 2026) · VTV 26.28% (Jun 30, 2026)

Combined ETF holdings
SecuritySectorQQQVTVCombined weightShared minimum
MUMicron Technology IncTechnology5.64%4.87%5.25%4.87%
NVDANVIDIA CorpTechnology7.6%0%3.8%0%
AAPLApple IncTechnology6.67%0%3.33%0%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc (Class A/C)Communication services6.29%0%3.15%0%
MSFTMicrosoft CorpTechnology4.35%0%2.17%0%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices IncTechnology4.1%0%2.05%0%
AMZNAmazon.com IncConsumer discretionary4.02%0%2.01%0%
TSLATesla IncConsumer discretionary3.3%0%1.65%0%
JPMJPMorgan Chase & CoFinancials0%3.06%1.53%0%
INTCIntel CorpTechnology3.04%0%1.52%0%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway IncFinancials0%2.95%1.47%0%
AVGOBroadcom IncTechnology2.81%0%1.41%0%
METAMeta Platforms IncCommunication services2.62%0%1.31%0%
AMATApplied Materials IncTechnology2.49%0%1.24%0%
JNJJohnson & JohnsonHealth care0%2.29%1.14%0%
After the overlap

Read shared weight as an exposure clue

Minimum-weight overlap compares fund holdings before your allocation is applied. Combined exposure uses your allocation. Both depend on coverage and snapshot dates.

  1. 01Check both snapshot dates
  2. 02Compare shared minimum with combined exposure
  3. 03Export the filtered holdings table

Related comparisons

Put the explanation to work.

Change the assumptions, compare the results, and export the numbers without creating an account.

Open FundOverlapCheck

Tool settings